Friday, August 14, 2009

25 Sites "Time" Can't Live Without

Here I List Popular websites that linked to our daliy life. The below information has taken from Time Magazine. I believe Time prepared this list based on many aspects (Sites based on US Traffic) & I've no involvment with the below list.
  1. Amazon.com
  2. BBC.co.uk
  3. Citysearch.com
  4. Craigslist.org
  5. Del.icio.us
  6. Digg.com
  7. Ebay.com
  8. ESPN.com
  9. Facebook.com
  10. FactCheck.org
  11. Flickr.com
  12. Google.com
  13. HowStuffWorks.com
  14. The Internet Movie Database
  15. YouTube
  16. Kayak.com
  17. National Geographic.com
  18. Netflix.com
  19. Technorati.com
  20. TMZ.com
  21. USA.gov
  22. Television WithoutPity.com
  23. WebMD.com
  24. Wikipedia.org
  25. Yahoo.com
Cheers,
Jenson

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Popular Web Applications Written in PHP

Here I list Some of the Most Popular PHP applications that linked directly or indirectly to everyone. From managing databases to shopping, writing blogs to sending emails. Ten years of passion, great software architectures, team work and revolutionary ideas. Here are the Some of most influential & Popular open-source PHP applications:

1998

phpMyAdmin

phpMyAdmin is a tool written in PHP intended to handle the administration of MySQL over the Web. Currently it can create and drop databases, create/drop/alter tables, delete/edit/add fields, execute any SQL statement, manage keys on fields, manage privileges, export data into various formats and is available in 50 languages. Development is backed up by the phpMyAdmin team.

1999

SquirrelMail

SquirrelMail is a standards-based Webmail package. It includes built-in pure PHP support for the IMAP and SMTP protocols, and all pages are rendered in pure HTML 4.0 for maximum compatibility across browsers. It has very few requirements, and is very easy to configure and install. It has all the functionality you would want from an email client, including strong MIME support, address books, and folder manipulation.

PHP-Nuke

(Added by popular demand)

PHP-Nuke is a Web portal and online community system that includes Web-based administration, surveys, access statistics, user customizable boxes, a themes manager for registered users, friendly administration GUI with graphic topic manager, the ability to edit or delete stories, an option to delete comments, a moderation system, referer tracking, integrated banner ad system, search engine, backend/headlines generation (RSS/RDF format), Web directory like Yahoo, events manager, and support for 33 languages and 9 database servers.

2000

eZ Publish

eZ Publish is an Enterprise Content Management platform with an easy to use out of the box Web Content Management System. It is available as a free Open Source distribution and serves as the foundation for the rest of the eZ Publish Product Family. As a CMS it’s most notable feature is its revolutionary, fully customisable and extendable content model. It is also a platform for general web development, allowing you to develop professional PHP applications. Standard eZ Publish functionality: easy to create and edit content, workflow system, content versioning, multilanguage possibilities, collaboration, e-commerce functionality, revolutionary content class system, role based access control are implemented and ready for you to use. High quality software and total product responsibility from eZ systems make eZ publish the leading Open Source Enterprise Content Management System. Enterprises, governmental offices, organizations and educational institutions trust eZ Publish.

osCommerce

osCommerce is an open source e-commerce solution under on going development by the open source community. Its feature packed out-of-the- box installation allows store owners to setup, run, and maintain their online stores with minimum effort and with no costs involved. osCommerce combines open source solutions to provide a free and open development platform, which includes the powerful PHP web scripting language, the stable Apache web server, and the fast MySQL database server.

phpAdsNew

OpenX began as phpAdsNew, a fork from a similar project called phpAds, created by Tobias Ratschiller in 1998. OpenX is a hugely popular, free ad server designed by web publishers for web publishers. It provides everything you need to manage your on-line advertising. It allows paid banners to be easily rotated along with your own in-house advertisements, and can even integrate banners from third party advertising companies.

phpBB

phpBB is a fast, efficient discussion board program built in PHP with a muti-database backend. Features include: posting, replying, private messages, polls, username/ip banning, strong encryption for storing passwords, user rankings, very advanced access control for private forums, full templating, simple yet robust translation system and much more.

2001

Gallery

Gallery is a slick Web-based photo album written using PHP. It is easy to install, includes a config wizard, and provides users with the ability to create and maintain their own albums in the album collection via an intuitive Web interface. Photo management includes automatic thumbnail creation, image resizing, rotation, ordering, captioning and more. Albums can have read, write, and caption permissions per individual authenticated user for an additional level of privacy.

Drupal

Drupal is a modular content management system, forum, blogging and community engine. It is database driven and can be used with MySQL, MySQLi and PostgreSQL. Its features include (but are not limited to) discussion forums, Web-based administration, theme support, a submission queue, content rating, content versioning, taxonomy support, user management with a fine-grained permission system based on user roles (groups), error logging, support for content syndication, locale support, and much more. It is considered to be an excellent platform for developers due to its clean code and extensibility, and it can also be used as a Web application framework.

2002

MediaWiki

MediaWiki is a web-based wiki software application used by all projects of the Wikimedia Foundation, all wikis hosted by Wikia, and many other wikis, including some of the largest and most popular ones. Originally developed to serve the needs of the free content Wikipedia encyclopedia, today it has also been deployed by companies for internal knowledge management, and as a content management system. Notably, Novell uses it to operate several of its high traffic websites.

2003

WordPress

WordPress is a state-of-the-art, semantic, personal publishing platform with a focus on aesthetics, Web standards, and usability. It was born out of a desire for an elegant, well-architected personal publishing system. While primarily geared towards functioning as a Weblog, WordPress is also a flexible CMS capable of managing many types of Web sites. In addition to the basic blog functions, it also has an integrated link manager (e.g. for blogrolls), file attachments, XFN support, support for stand-alone pages, Atom and RSS feeds for both content and comments, blogging API support (Atom Publishing Protocol, Blogger, MetaWeblog, and Movable Type APIs), spam blocking features, advanced cruft-free URL generation, a flexible theme system, and an advanced plugin API.

2004

SugarCRM

SugarCRM is a complete CRM system for businesses of all sizes. Core CRM functionality includes sales force automation, marketing campaigns, support cases, project mgmt, calendaring and more. Built in PHP, supports MySQL and SQL Server.

2005

Joomla!

Joomla! is an award-winning Web-based content management system. It provides for split front end content access and backend administrator access. Group-based access control allows for different levels of system control for both the site and the administrator. The Joomla! framework allows for extension by installable components (applications), modules (template blocks), languages, templates, and mambots (plugins that enhance system functions).

Symfony

Symfony is a full-stack framework, a library of cohesive classes written in PHP5. It provides an architecture, components and tools for developers to build complex web applications faster. Choosing symfony allows you to release your applications earlier, host and scale them without problem, and maintain them over time with no surprise. Symfony is based on experience. It does not reinvent the wheel: it uses most of the best practices of web development and integrates some great third-party libraries.

2006

Zend Framework

Extending the art & spirit of PHP, Zend Framework is based on simplicity, object-oriented best practices, corporate friendly licensing, and a rigorously tested agile codebase. Zend Framework is focused on building more secure, reliable, and modern Web 2.0 applications & web services, and consuming widely available APIs from leading vendors like Google, Amazon, Yahoo!, Flickr, as well as API providers and cataloguers like StrikeIron and ProgrammableWeb.

2007

Magento eCommerce

Magento is a new professional open-source eCommerce solution offering unprecedented flexibility and control. It was designed with the notion that each eCommerce implementation has to be unique since no two businesses are alike. Magento’s modular architecture puts the control back in the hands of the online merchant and places no constraints on business processes and flow.

Cheers,

Jenson

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

Google Caffeine is Coming!

Have you Noticed this? Google is launching a new, upgraded version of its search engine soon. Google has annouced a new version of its core engine is now in testing. Code named Google Caffeine, the new engine in our tests has some dramatic changes both good and bad.

Google promises that the new search tool (codename “Caffeine”) will improve the speed, accuracy, size, and comprehensiveness of Google search.

Remember normally Google is about users not webmasters, but in this case, Google is opening their Sandbox to the public (and us). You can visit the web developer preview of Google’s new infrastructure at http://www2.sandbox.google.com/ and try searches there. While the developer version is a pre-beta release, it’s completely usable.

Comparison Of Old Google Results and New Google Results:

I here list comparison of Old Google Results and New Google Results from two websites namely mashable.com and mark8t.com

From mashable.com:

"While the developer version is a pre-beta release, it’s completely usable. Thus, we’ve decided to put the new Google search through the wringer. We took the developer version for a spin and compared it to not only the current version of Google Search, but to Bing as well.

The categories we tested the new search engine on are as follows: speed, accuracy, temporal relevancy, and index size. Here’s how we define those:

Speed: How fast can the new search engine load results?

Accuracy: Which set of results is more accurate to the search term?

Temporal Relevancy: Is one version of search better at capturing breaking news?

Index Size: Is it really more comprehensive than the last version of Google?

So without further ado, here’s the test:


1. Speed


The first category is incredibly important. How fast do these Google search results come at you anyway? Even a tenth of a second can mean millions for the search company as the longer it takes the load, the more likely someone will go look for results somewhere else.

So how fast is the new search? Lightning fast. As you probably know, Google tells you how long it takes to load results. We tried a few search terms, starting with “Dog.” Here’s the speed result:


Compare that to the original Google search:


0.12 vs. 0.25 seconds? They doubled the speed! That’s tremendous. We tried it with a variety of search terms (”The end of the universe is not here,” “There is no way that you cannot find ben parr. He is hiding back behind the tv,” “FriendFeed,” etc.), and in every instance, the new Google won.

The only potential weak spot was when we added search commands like quotes, subtraction signs, and more. In this case, it was a 50/50 shot as to which Google search was faster.

As for comparing it to Bing: Well, they don’t display how fast it generates results. It’ll have to sit out this speed test for now.

Winner: The New Google


2. Accuracy


While more subjective, accuracy is probably the issue that users care about most. Does the search engine find what you want on the first try? Well, we did our subjective test. New version:


Old version:


You’ll notice that many of the blended search options, like image search and news, don’t appear in the new version. It’s more likely that the features haven’t all been implemented, but it does decrease its relevancy. FriendFeed ranks much higher in the new search than Twitter or Facebook. Our bet is that the new Google has seen a burst of activity on FriendFeed and thus pushes up that result.

Both sets are very accurate, but subjectively, the set displayed by the new Google search more accurately reflect what a user would be looking for. If you’re wondering about Bing, it didn’t even bring up my personal website.

The next search, “Are social media jobs here to stay?” focused on getting my first Mashable article. The result? The new search cares more about keywords than the last. You could clearly see it cared about the full title and brought up more results with those keywords. Both brought a different set of results, but the new search was more relevant.

Winner: The New Google (tentatively)


3. Temporal Relevancy


How good is each at breaking news? The answer: about the same. FriendFeed results were identical, including the top news items. Searches for “Hall of Fame Game” got better news results on the new search. A search for “China Landslide” also got the same Yahoo and BBC news articles – although we did notice that the new search seems to change faster with new articles. It put an MSNBC article up high for updating the death toll:


We also give credit to Bing – on each search, it brought up great results.

Winner: Draw


4. Index Size:


Perhaps the easiest to test, we can tell the index size based on how many results come up for specific search. Here are searches once again for “dog:”

New:


Old:


Bing:


Searches for “Ben Parr” proved that the new Google is better than the old Google in terms of result size. Bing claims 2,210,000 for my name compared to 183,000 for my name, which is strange. Searches for “Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland Trailer” also show Bing > New Google > Old Google

Winner: Bing, it seems


Conclusion


While this test was nowhere near scientific, we do have some solid takeaways:

New Google is FAST: It often doubled the speed of Google classic.

New Google relies more on keywords: SEO professionals, your job just got a lot harder. The algorithm’s definitely different. It has more reliance on keyword strings to produce better results.

Search is moving into real-time: Being able to get info on breaking events is clearly a priority for Google and Bing. With both Twitter and Facebook launching real-time search engines, they needed to respond.

It’s partially a response to Bing: At least, that’s how we feel. This new search has a focus on increasing speed, relevancy, accuracy, and the index volume, things that Microsoft really hit on when it released Bing. It feels as if Google “Caffeine” is meant to shore up any deficiencies it may have when compared to Microsoft’s offering, though it’s been in the works long before Bing launched.

The new Google will only get better as features are implemented and developed. The end result is a better search experience for the user. Competition really does breed innovation."

From mark8t.com:

"Right now, we only want feedback on thedifferences between Google’s current search results and our new system. We’re also interested in higher-level feedback (”These types of sites seem to rank better or worse in the new system”) in addition to “This specific site should or shouldn’t rank for this query.” Engineers will be reading the feedback, but we won’t have the cycles to send replies.”

So how do you share the feedback? Do a search with and look on the search result Google.com and at Google’s Sandbox Caffeine engine. If you find something you wish to report head to the bottom of the page and click “Dissatisfied? Help us improve.” Type your feedback in the text box and then include the word caffeine somewhere in the text box. We highly recommend you check out your site, key industry terms for you and share your feedback. On our searches we found some interesting results and important changes. We wanted to share with you to see how “Caffeine” will change your Google experience.

Term: mark8t
Old Google: : 5190 results and no sitelinks
New Google:4680 results and sitelinks

Term: Montreal
Old Google: Tourism for Montreal is more prominent.
New Google: The official city of Montreal site is more prominent.

Term: Michael Jackson
Old Google: Very clear results, about Michael Jackson, focused on him and fan related sites.
New Google: A site about Michael’s face is on the first page of results, high up."

You can also test New Google Here

Cheers,

Jenson


Some Reasons Why The Bing-Yahoo Deal Is A Good One

Although the proposed union of Microsoft's Bing and Yahoo's search engines has led Congress to say that the deal warrants "careful scrutiny," such a merger of search giants could actually benefit the public. Here's why the Microsoft-Yahoo partnershipshould proceed, and why Google will likely flourish despite -- or because of -- it.

1. Search will improve. Competition always shakes things up. True, Bing and Yahoo are already competitors. But face it, they are weak ones. Together, Bing and Yahoo can pack a bigger punch. According to Web metric firm StatCounter, Bing climbed to 9.41 percent of the search market in July, up from 8.23 percent in June. Add in Yahoo's current 10.95 percent share of the market and that's 20.36 percent—still a distant second to Google's 77.54 percent, but formidable. It will be incumbent upon the players to offer the best product in order to increase their own market share. While Google's not likely to be torn asunder, it is likely that the search giant will more aggressively invest in R&D, new technologies, startups, etc., in order to remain a dominant force. Further, there's reason only to believe that the potential market will continue to grow, not shrink, so even one-fifth or one-quarter of that pie is still very appealing to Microsoft-Yahoo.

2. Yahoo will make money. Under the proposed 10-year arrangement, Microsoft's Bing search engine will be featured on Yahoo pages. That offers Bing more visibility, something crucial to a fledgling offering, even one backed by Microsoft. While Yahoo handles ad sales, Microsoft will pay Yahoo a whopping 88 percent of the search revenue generated for the first five years. Microsoft will also pay Yahoo $50 million annually during the first three years of the search agreement. Clearly, the arrangement is a financial boon for Yahoo, and the increased revenue will create a stronger company and more viable competitor to the likes of Google.

3. Profits from ad sales will rise. Yahoo's not the only company that can profit. As search technology improves, users will gravitate toward the best offering, and so will advertisers, which bid for the "right" to search terms. The advertiser with the highest bid per user click gets its ad next to the search results. In the end, advertisers are mostly concerned with the number of users who become customers; therefore, they will pay more for better ad-matching results.

Strong Start for Bing: Yahoo! and Google Lose Share

Yes we know its early, but congrats to the team at Bing.com. Even though Bing.com is not even 1 week old, it is already off to a strong start. According to the latest stats from Statcounter.com, Bing is now the number 2 search engine in America with 16.2% share. Google still is over 70% and Yahoo is third at 10%.

bing market share Strong Start for Bing: Yahoo! and Google Lose Share

Pre-Bing, the Windows Live search was 6% share, Yahoo was a solid 13-14% and Google rarely went below 75%. A note about the Statcounter stats, because they seem to me the most accurate. Data ise based on aggregate data collected by StatCounter on a sample exceeding 4 billion pageviews per month collected from across the StatCounter network of more than 3 million websites.

The real question for Microsoft and the Bing.com project is will users keep coming back? Simply put can Bing.com get brand stickiness? I think the idea of Bing as Google killer is fantastical and thankfully it is not being thrown around in the media the way it was with Cuil.com. Furthermore, Google is not a vulnerable target, As an article in AdAge recently noted about a Google study: “Google has conducted internal tests, according to ‘people familiar with them, in which the company put its logo and treatment on another engine’s search results. Users still prefer the results with the Google logo, even if they’re not Google results.” There would need to be a fundamental change of users habits,and this doe snot happen over-night. I think Yahoo! should be much more concerned, I also think its good to hear the Microsoft be realists about their efforts in the Search Engine wars. As Steve Ballmer recently noted at the D7 conference ” [Bing]differentiates itself from Google. It might not appeal to everyone, but if it appeals to 20 percent of them, that’s a success.”

The real trick will be to see if the Bing 80 Million advertising campaign can solidify their spot as the 2nd most popular search engine and in the process, make some people change their Google only habit. Truthfully, the real goal is to create competition. Michael Arrington sums it up best : “whether Microsoft ultimately succeeds or not in ‘winning’ the search war, the competition is very good for the rest of the Internet. Google needs to be pushed to try innovating new things. And search marketing competition will ensure that Google doesn’t get too greedy. We don’t need Microsoft to win, but we do need to avoid a world with just one search engine that matters. Maybe Microsoft can win that lesser war, at least.”

Cheers,

Jenson



Saturday, August 8, 2009

100 Oldest .COM domains on the Web

Here is the list of 100 oldest .Com domains on the Web.

Create Date
Domain Name
03/15/1985
SYMBOLICS.COM
04/24/1985
BBN.COM
05/24/1985
THINK.COM
07/11/1985
MCC.COM
09/30/1985
DEC.COM
11/07/1985
NORTHROP.COM
01/09/1986
XEROX.COM
01/17/1986
SRI.COM
03/03/1986
HP.COM
03/05/1986
BELLCORE.COM
03/19/1986
IBM.COM
03/19/1986
SUN.COM
03/25/1986
INTEL.COM
03/25/1986
TI.COM
04/25/1986
ATT.COM
05/08/1986
GMR.COM
05/08/1986
TEK.COM
07/10/1986
FMC.COM
07/10/1986
UB.COM
08/05/1986
BELL-ATL.COM
08/05/1986
GE.COM
08/05/1986
GREBYN.COM
08/05/1986
ISC.COM
08/05/1986
NSC.COM
08/05/1986
STARGATE.COM
09/02/1986
BOEING.COM
09/18/1986
ITCORP.COM
09/29/1986
SIEMENS.COM
10/18/1986
PYRAMID.COM
10/27/1986
ALPHACDC.COM
10/27/1986
BDM.COM
10/27/1986
FLUKE.COM
10/27/1986
INMET.COM
10/27/1986
KESMAI.COM
10/27/1986
MENTOR.COM
10/27/1986
NEC.COM
10/27/1986
RAY.COM
10/27/1986
ROSEMOUNT.COM
10/27/1986
VORTEX.COM
11/05/1986
ALCOA.COM
11/05/1986
GTE.COM
11/17/1986
ADOBE.COM
11/17/1986
AMD.COM
11/17/1986
DAS.COM
11/17/1986
DATA-IO.COM
11/17/1986
OCTOPUS.COM
11/17/1986
PORTAL.COM
11/17/1986
TELTONE.COM
12/11/1986
3COM.COM
12/11/1986
AMDAHL.COM
12/11/1986
CCUR.COM
12/11/1986
CI.COM
12/11/1986
CONVERGENT.COM
12/11/1986
DG.COM
12/11/1986
PEREGRINE.COM
12/11/1986
QUAD.COM
12/11/1986
SQ.COM
12/11/1986
TANDY.COM
12/11/1986
TTI.COM
12/11/1986
UNISYS.COM
01/19/1987
CGI.COM
01/19/1987
CTS.COM
01/19/1987
SPDCC.COM
02/19/1987
APPLE.COM
03/04/1987
NMA.COM
03/04/1987
PRIME.COM
04/04/1987
PHILIPS.COM
04/23/1987
DATACUBE.COM
04/23/1987
KAI.COM
04/23/1987
TIC.COM
04/23/1987
VINE.COM
04/30/1987
NCR.COM
05/14/1987
CISCO.COM
05/14/1987
RDL.COM
05/20/1987
SLB.COM
05/27/1987
PARCPLACE.COM
05/27/1987
UTC.COM
06/26/1987
IDE.COM
07/09/1987
TRW.COM
07/13/1987
UNIPRESS.COM
07/27/1987
DUPONT.COM
07/27/1987
LOCKHEED.COM
07/28/1987
ROSETTA.COM
08/18/1987
TOAD.COM
08/31/1987
QUICK.COM
09/03/1987
ALLIED.COM
09/03/1987
DSC.COM
09/03/1987
SCO.COM
09/22/1987
GENE.COM
09/22/1987
KCCS.COM
09/22/1987
SPECTRA.COM
09/22/1987
WLK.COM
09/30/1987
MENTAT.COM
10/14/1987
WYSE.COM
11/02/1987
CFG.COM
11/09/1987
MARBLE.COM
11/16/1987
CAYMAN.COM
11/16/1987
ENTITY.COM
11/24/1987
KSR.COM
11/30/1987


NYNEXST.COM


Cheers,
Jenson

AB

Your Ad Here

If You Wish To.....

Google.com is a(n)

Freelancer

Search This Blog

Knt

Followers